Starknet STRK

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of clear on-time delivery data, and historical events show both outages and recovery.Weight 35%Insufficient data, with delays · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been version upgrades and feature launches, but the mainnet has also gone down.Weight 30%Some upgrades have been delivered, but there are outages · 50 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Historical records show that the mainnet experienced outages and was restored.Weight 15%There are records of outages and recovery · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum L2, it adopts the STARK proof mechanism.Weight 30%ZK-Rollup (STARK) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet went live in February 2024, with a relatively short operating time.Weight 15%About 2.3 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, the mainnet experienced outages, affecting the overall quality evaluation of upgrades.Weight 35%There are outages, and stability needs improvement · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?Currently, it mainly relies on the Cairo language and StarkNet OS, resulting in insufficient client diversity.Weight 20%Single client · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The token burn mechanism is relatively weak, and its deflationary effect is not obvious.Weight 30%Weak deflationary mechanisms · 30 / 100

Inflation rate?There are numerous token unlock plans, which will lead to an increase in circulating supply.Weight 25%There is unlocking inflation · 40 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear data on staking rates or locked amounts.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%10 billion · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by top VCs.Weight 30%The core team is highly experienced, with strong VC backgrounds · 95 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Safety scores and governance intensity are high, and governance mechanisms are sound.Weight 25%Good (91.30 / 100) · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with clear financing records.Weight 25%High (91.00 / 100) · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract allows for additional issuance rights, which may lead to the concentration of power among key individuals.Weight 20%Risk of centralization · 75 / 100

Active Address?A high daily active address score indicates good user activity.Weight 30%High (100 / 100) · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an Ethereum L2, it actively expands into the Solana and Bitcoin ecosystems.Weight 25%Multi-chain ecosystem (Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin) · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked in DeFi is moderate.Weight 25%Approximately $198 million · 70 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public GitHub active data and low development activity trend scores.Weight 20%Insufficient data, low activity · 50 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Historical records show that the mainnet has experienced multiple outages.Weight 25%There have been multiple outages · 10 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As a L2, its regulatory stance is influenced by Ethereum, creating uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on L2 tokens remains unclear and controversial.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of data on client bug frequency, but historical outage events indicate there are issues.Weight 15%Insufficient data, and downtime · 0 / 100