Sushi SUSHI

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of detailed delivery information for recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 15 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of detailed data on historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Deployed on mature PoS chains such as Ethereum, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The protocol has a long runtime and has been validated by the market.Weight 15%About 6 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?The protocol continues to be updated, but there is a lack of specific upgrade quality data.Weight 35%Continuous iteration · 70 / 100

Client Diversity?As a DEX, client diversity depends on the underlying blockchain.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of a clear token burn mechanism, so the deflationary effect is not obvious.Weight 30%Weak · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?Tokens have the ability to issue additional coins and carry higher inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The token lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the risk of market selling pressure is high.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict supply cap for tokens, so there is a risk of issuance.Weight 20%No hardtop · 20 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have clear backgrounds but are relatively small in scale.Weight 30%The core team is stable · 65 / 100

Governance mechanisms?DAO governance using Snapshot offers high transparency.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Snapshot) · 80 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and fund usage are highly transparent.Weight 25%Relatively high · 79 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract owners have significant authority, posing a certain concentration risk.Weight 20%Exist · 50 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is strong, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%Relatively high · 94 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Widely deployed on multiple mainstream blockchains and L2 networks.Weight 25%40+ (Multi-chain Deployment) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked by protocols is moderate, with room for growth.Weight 25%Approximately $95.9 million · 60 / 100

Developer community?As a well-established DEX, it should have an active developer community.Weight 20%Active · 70 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There have been multiple security incidents in history, and there are red lines for permission leaks.Weight 25%Multiple times (including $3.34 million in losses) · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory attitudes tend to be cautious, and there are red lines for permission leakage.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance is controversial and there are red lines for permission leakage.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data, but the red line of permission leakage affects overall security.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100