TokenFi TOKEN

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data deliveryWeight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Development activity has been zero in the past six months, with no recent upgradesWeight 30%No significant progress · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Public channels lack information on milestones to be deliveredWeight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical records of project delaysWeight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature PoS mechanism, it offers high securityWeight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has stabilizedWeight 15%About 2.6 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade quality data and low development activityWeight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream blockchainsWeight 20%Multi-chain deployment · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The project has a token burn mechanism that helps with deflationWeight 30%There is a destruction mechanism · 50 / 100

Inflation rate?Currently, inflation is low, and a small number of tokens will be unlocked in the futureWeight 25%Low, with only a few unlocks · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data, or low proportionsWeight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The token supply has a clear hard cap, and the total supply is fixedWeight 20%10 billion (hard top) · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and VC supportWeight 30%The team has a strong background · 70 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are relatively centralized, but funds are transparentWeight 25%Centralized governance with high transparency · 80 / 100

Financial Transparency?The use of project funds and proposal voting are highly transparentWeight 25%High transparency of funds · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?The project carries certain risks of concentrated key individuals or addressesWeight 20%There is a concentration risk · 60 / 100

Active Address?The number of active project addresses is above averageWeight 30%Activity level is above average · 80 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed across multiple mainstream blockchain ecosystemsWeight 25%Multi-chain deployment · 75 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselvesWeight 25%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Developer community?High social media attention, insufficient developer community dataWeight 20%The community is highly active · 70 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries backdoor code risks and has triggered a safety red lineWeight 25%There is a risk of backdoor code · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information and a cautious attitudeWeight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The lack of a clear SEC stance and widespread regulatory uncertainty prevailWeight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lacking data on client bug frequency, but code auditing is goodWeight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100