Tutorial TUT
Tutorial leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C-45.97 / 100
Sector Rank #88 · Global Rank #304
Overall Rating
C- · 45.97 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
54
Market Ecosystem
68
Security & Compliance
60.15
Overall Score
45.97
Tutorial overall rating C- (total score 45.23), ranking high in six dimensions for market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Tutorial has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in the economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records makes it impossible to assess.Weight 35%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public upgrade records, making it impossible to assess recent deliveries.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public milestone information makes it impossible to identify pending deliveries.Weight 20%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
History Extension Record?There is no public record of extensions, and no negative information is available.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
60.5/100Consensus Mechanism?As a BNB Chain token, it inherits its mature PoSA consensus mechanism.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet will launch in February 2025, with a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of public codebase and upgrade records makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public codebase information makes it impossible to assess client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Current supply has not reached the cap, but there is no inflation or deflation mechanism.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms were found, indicating high concentration of chips.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but there is a lack of value capture mechanisms.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Team Governance
53.5/100Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in size, and public background information is limited.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Safety Score: Governance intensity scores are relatively high, and the mechanism is sound.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, but there is no public financing information.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
65.5/100Active Address?Active addresses performed well, and user engagement was high.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The ecosystem is single, with low third-party integration.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project itself is not DeFi, but relying on the BNB Chain ecosystem, it has a relatively high TVL.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Developer community?Lack of open code base and active developer community.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
59/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The overall crypto regulatory environment is leaning toward caution.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on crypto assets remains uncertain.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| TutorialC- · 45.97 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 45.97 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 54 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 68 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 60.15 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.