USD1 USD1

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmaps and delivery records, making it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery information and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public delivery milestones are available, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relying on mature underlying chain consensus and lacking independent consensus itself.Weight 30%Relies on underlying chain consensus (mainly PoS) · 60 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project started relatively quickly, with the mainnet operating for about one year.Weight 15%About 1 year · 50 / 100

Recent upgrades?Smart contracts operate under a proxy model, which carries potential risks.Weight 35%There is an agency contract · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, this metric does not apply directly.Weight 20%Not applicable · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on deflationary mechanisms and cannot be assessed.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?As a stablecoin, its supply is flexibly adjusted according to market demand.Weight 25%Elastic supply · 50 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Almost no tokens are staked or locked, and liquidity is concentrated.Weight 25%About 0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?As a stablecoin, its supply is flexibly adjusted according to market demand.Weight 20%No rigid upper limit · 50 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team's background information is limited and lacks visibility.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are highly transparent, but specific participation levels are unknown.Weight 25%Governance transparency is acceptable · 82 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund usage and proposal voting is high.Weight 25%Fund-making transparency is acceptable · 82 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold extremely high coins, carrying significant centralization risks.Weight 20%Approximately 94.8% · 5 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is strong, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High activity · 96.1 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Widely deployed on multiple mainstream public chains, offering excellent cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%9+ chains · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of specific data on USD1's locked value in DeFi.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Smart contracts carry risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Stablecoins are facing increasingly strict scrutiny from global regulators.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC has disputes over the securities nature and regulatory framework of stablecoins.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client-side bug frequency data makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100