USDtb USDTB

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent significant development activity or upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It operates on a mature and secure Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short operating time and insufficient stability accumulation.Weight 15%Less than 1 year · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available up-to-date upgrade records and quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokens on Ethereum, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%Gao (Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?As a stablecoin, its design goal is to maintain its peg, not deflation.Weight 30%No obvious deflation · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?Stablecoin supply elasticity adjustments to maintain peg to fiat currencies.Weight 25%Elastic supply · 60 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of staking or lock-up mechanisms, resulting in high market liquidity.Weight 25%Very Low · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?As a stablecoin, its supply is flexibly adjusted based on market demand with no fixed upper limit.Weight 20%No fixed upper limit · 50 / 100

Core Development Team?Insufficient disclosure of core development team background information, absence of GitHub activity.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?With proxy contracts, governance authority may be highly centralized.Weight 25%Centralised · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency of funds is performing well, but there is still room for improvement.Weight 25%Slightly above average · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%Extremely high · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is very low, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%Very Low · 7.4 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on several mainstream chains such as Ethereum and Solana.Weight 25%2+ · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of specific TVL and integration data for USDtb in the DeFi ecosystem.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Developer community?Lack of an active developer community and open codebase.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract contains proxy backdoor code and poses a risk of permission leakage.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Despite institutional endorsement, compliance details and VASP/KYC data are missing.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on it as a stablecoin remains unclear.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client codebase and bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100