Vanar Chain VANRY

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery information and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is no historical record of delays, making it impossible to judge.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a smart contract platform, it is presumed to adopt a PoS consensus mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (estimated) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has passed its initial stage, and its stability remains to be seen.Weight 15%About 2.2 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available up-to-date escalation information and quality assessments.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data makes it impossible to assess the degree of decentralization.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear deflationary mechanism and weak token value capture capability.Weight 30%No obvious mechanism is found · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract carries the risk of token issuance, and inflation rates may go uncontrolled.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of staking or lock-up data, or very low proportions, resulting in high market liquidity.Weight 25%Low / Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Despite the maximum supply, contracts can be issued additionally, rendering the supply cap virtually meaningless.Weight 20%There is a risk of additional issuance · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, but their background scores are average.Weight 30%The core team is public · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are sound, with safety ratings and internal evaluations showing good results.Weight 25%Sound mechanisms · 83 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds and backing from well-known investment institutions.Weight 25%Relatively high · 83 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team is relatively small, posing a certain risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%Slightly high · 15 / 100

Active Address?A high number of daily active addresses indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%Relatively high · 83 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on Ethereum, Polygon, and Vanar Chain, but has relatively low third-party integration.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of native DeFi TVL data for Vanar Chain makes it impossible to assess ecosystem scale.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activity data, and missing GitHub repository.Weight 20%Low activity / insufficient data · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a lack of publicly available records of major security incidents, but the token carries the risk of additional issuance.Weight 25%No public record · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance data and extremely low internal compliance scores pose risks of additional issuance.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lacking a clear stance from the SEC but overall low compliance scores, there is potential controversy.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess code stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100