Vaulta A

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been major events such as brand renaming and Binance going public.Weight 30%There are major events, but there are no escalation details · 75 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on EOS history, it is speculated to be the DPoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%DPoS (estimated) · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short operating time, about one year.Weight 15%About 1 year · 65 / 100

Recent upgrades?There have been major recent events, but details of technical upgrades are lacking.Weight 35%Lack of technical upgrade details · 70 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Inflation rate?The existing circulating supply is lower than the total supply, indicating potential inflation.Weight 25%Potential inflation present · 75 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public data on staking rates or staking rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 80 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%2.1 billion (hardtop) · 95 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have high recognition within the industry.Weight 30%A well-known core team · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Market data shows it is non-decentralized, and governance mechanisms may be more centralized.Weight 25%Centralization tendency · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?Disclosure of total financing amount and partial investor information.Weight 25%Disclosure of financing information · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?Core team members are well-known but may face concentration risks.Weight 20%There is a certain degree of concentration · 65 / 100

Active Address?Lack of public data on active addresses.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Currently, the ecosystem is mainly based on a single main chain, with insufficient information on ecosystem expansion.Weight 25%Single main chain · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is positioned as a Web3 bank, an atypical DeFi project.Weight 25%Non-DeFi projects · 75 / 100

Developer community?Missing activity data in GitHub repository, questionable developer community activity.Weight 20%Low activity · 70 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 85 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The project is positioned as a Web3 bank, which may face prudential regulation.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 70 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC has taken a cautious stance toward crypto assets, especially financial services projects.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 70 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 65 / 100