Worldcoin WLD

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap milestone data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been several important events and product launches recently.Weight 30%3 / 4 (Based on Project Data Events) · 70 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting Ethereum's PoS security and adopting Optimistic Rollup.Weight 30%Optimistic Rollup (based on Ethereum PoS) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%About 2.8 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, important product upgrades and feature expansions have been released.Weight 35%Super App Release (2025-12) · 85 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public data on the diversity of World Chain clients.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%&None · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, creating significant unlocking pressure.Weight 25%There is a significant underlying inflation · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear data on staking or locking, and existing data is relatively low.Weight 25%Low / Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%10 billion · 80 / 100

Core Development Team?The team members have strong backgrounds, including well-known co-founders.Weight 30%Renowned Team (Sam Altman) · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The degree of decentralization in projects is low, and governance transparency data is lacking.Weight 25%Risk of centralization · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Secured substantial funding from well-known institutions, with ample capital reserves.Weight 25%Transparent financing and ample funding · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?There is a risk of contract permission, and the project is highly dependent on key individuals.Weight 20%High (risk of contract permission) · 10 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses perform well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Activity level is good · 80 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on multiple mainstream chains and L2s, offering good scalability.Weight 25%3 (Ethereum, Optimism, World Chain) · 75 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not primarily DeFi and lacks TVL data.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 20 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public GitHub activity data raises doubts about developer community activity.Weight 20%Low activity level / insufficient data · 25 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a lack of publicly available records of major security incidents, but contract risks exist.Weight 25%No public record · 20 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a risk of contract permission leakage and global regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%Controversial / cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Given the global regulatory environment and project risks, the SEC may take a more cautious stance.Weight 30%Controversial / cautious · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100