ApeCoin APE

Smart Contract PlatformGameNFT

ApeCoin leads in security, compliance, and team governance, with technical implementation remaining a key focus, currently holding an B+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-01
B+79.34 / 100

Sector Rank #19 · Global Rank #19

Roadmap Delivery72.22C-
Technical Implementation68.05D+
Tokenomics82.8B-
Team Governance84.74B
Market Ecosystem78.61C+
Security & Compliance85.37B
01

Overall Rating

B+ · 79.34 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
72.22
Technical Implementation
68.05
Tokenomics
82.8
Team Governance
84.74
Market Ecosystem
78.61
Security & Compliance
85.37
Overall Score
79.34

ApeCoin has an overall rating B+f E- (total score 79.34), ranking high in six dimensions for security compliance, team governance, and economic modeling. The main point of deduction is technical implementation (68.05 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.

Rating Team Conclusion: "ApeCoin has relative advantages in security compliance, team governance, and economic modeling, but its current shortcomings are mainly in technical implementation." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

61/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There are important events and ecosystem expansions, but information on technology upgrades is unclear.Weight 30%There is an event delivery · 65 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear pending technology milestones.Weight 20%Lack of public information · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Technical Implementation

76.25/100

Consensus Mechanism?Relies on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Ethereum) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been running for a long time, accumulating some experience.Weight 15%About 4 years · 75 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available details of the latest technology upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on Ethereum client diversity and ecosystem health.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Tokenomics

66.25/100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%&None · 40 / 100

Inflation rate?The supply cap has been reached, with no new token inflation.Weight 25%0% · 95 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%1 billion · 90 / 100

Team Governance

67/100

Core Development Team?Lack of public information about the core development team.Weight 30%Lack of public information · 55 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Uses a snapshot voting mechanism, with active community governance.Weight 25%Snapshot Voting (DAO) · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public transparency in fund usage.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Concentration of key people?Lack of detailed data on the concentration of key individuals.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Market Ecosystem

64.75/100

Active Address?Lack of publicly available active address data.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed in multiple mainstream blockchain ecosystems.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (Ethereum, Solana, etc.) · 85 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of public DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?The community is highly active, but developer community data is lacking.Weight 20%Active communities, but insufficient developer data · 65 / 100

Security & Compliance

61.5/100

Historical Major Failure?So far, there have been no publicly disclosed records of major security incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory stance on NFTs and gaming tokens remains unclear.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on NFTs and related tokens remains unclear.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

04

B+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
ApeCoinB+ · 79.34Nervos NetworkB+ · 79.75THORChainB+ · 79.75dYdXB+ · 79.54
Overall Score79.3479.7579.7579.54
Roadmap Delivery72.2280.3475.4675.72
Technical Implementation68.0574.4568.5569.95
Tokenomics82.880.480.180.1
Team Governance84.7481.6985.8785.67
Market Ecosystem78.6176.7480.4880.34
Security & Compliance85.3783.7785.0383.41

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions