
Shmuel Eiderman
@_eidermanShmuel Eiderman 是 Utila 联合创始人兼 CTO,曾任谷歌高级软件工程师,具备云与工程底层能力;在加密领域主要围绕机构级基础设施与安全运营展开,属于偏技术驱动的关键建设者。
人物档案
Shmuel Eiderman 是 Utila 联合创始人兼 CTO,曾任谷歌高级软件工程师,具备云与工程底层能力;在加密领域主要围绕机构级基础设施与安全运营展开,属于偏技术驱动的关键建设者。
以工程可行性和产品落地为先,偏好低噪音、重基础设施的判断框架;风险偏好相对克制,更看重安全、可扩展性与长期使用场景。
公开信息显示他近期仍以 Utila 的技术与产品方向为核心,关注机构级加密资产管理、基础设施可靠性与安全能力建设,未见明显高频投资或媒体动作。
AI 风格画像务实派、技术型、保守派
主导特征务实派
从谷歌工程背景延续到加密创业,更强调系统设计、稳定性和可交付性,而非概念炒作。
比较优势技术型
兼具大厂软件工程经验与加密基础设施创业视角,能把复杂安全与运营问题拆解为可执行方案。
主要争议保守派
其风格更偏基础设施与机构需求,可能被认为不够激进;但这种克制也有助于降低执行与安全风险。
职业履历
Utila 联合创始人兼CTO
Sam (Shmuel) Eiderman 是 Utila 联合创始人兼首席技术官,此前是谷歌高级软件工程师。
关联实体
投资偏好
合规基础设施重仓
更可能偏向钱包、托管、密钥管理、交易与运营基础设施等机构级合规赛道。
安全与风控重视
从 CTO 视角出发,安全、权限控制和系统可靠性应是其判断项目价值的核心维度。
B2B 工具偏好
更契合其背景的是面向企业和机构的产品,而非纯消费级叙事。
长期价值审慎
倾向选择能形成长期使用壁垒、具备持续收入或基础设施属性的方向。
投资活动
关系网络
Shmuel Eiderman 的关系网络主要集中在 Utila 创业团队与其技术背景上;公开信息仅能确认他曾任谷歌高级软件工程师,并具备希伯来大学计算机科学训练,暂无足够证据扩展到投资、早期项目或更广泛同事圈。
链上持仓
| 持仓币种 | 价格 | 数量 | 总价值 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC BitcoinBTC | $109,240 | 420.00 | $45.8M |
ETH EthereumETH | $3,420 | 14,200 | $48.6M |
SOL SolanaSOL | $162.4 | 82,000 | $13.3M |
新闻动态
实时同步
加载中...社媒动态
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2026/04/02赛道影响Before I go in depth to explain the booster rocket stage of the Durable Nonces and how some architectural design of this feature played a crucial part in the exploit, I would just like to bring attention to the fact that wallet software should do more and invest more in the display of the transactions being signed. If you can’t read the “fine print” of the transaction payload you are signing - might as well just sign with your eyes closed. Read more on our blog: https://t.co/lvB423tRFJ Stay safe
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2026/04/02政策影响A quick recap of the Bybit hack to show the remarkable resemblance. Bybit’s treasury, secured by a multi-sig account (Gnosis Safe), on Ethereum - hacked ($1.4B) by compromising the Gnosis Safe UI, delivering an obfuscated payload instead of a legitimate transaction to signers - the transaction looked like a regular transfer, but was in fact reassigning the ownership of the entire Safe to the attacker. This was amplified by the use of an “advanced feature” of the Gnosis Safe. The use of this advanced feature probably went unnoticed by the signers, most likely because the wallet software did not emphasize it (link in comments for previous post). Now, Drift’s treasury, secured by a multi-sig account (Squads), on Solana - hacked by making 2 out of the 5 Squads admins sign a transaction that reassigned the ownership of the entire Squads mutil-sig to the attacker. This was amplified by the use of an “advanced feature” of Solana - Durable Nonces. And again, the use of this advanced feature probably went unnoticed by the signers, again - most likely because the wallet software did not emphasize its usage.
AI:偏政策推进,强调合规落地与规则明晰,对监管主线更敏感。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2026/04/02政策影响🚨 Drift Protocol on Solana - Compromised, 250M$ Stolen 🚨 Statement from Drift: "Earlier today, a malicious actor gained unauthorized access to Drift Protocol through a novel attack involving durable nonces, resulting in a rapid takeover of Drift’s Security Council administrative powers. This was a highly sophisticated operation that appears to have involved multi-week preparation and staged execution, including the use of durable nonce accounts to pre-sign transactions that delayed execution."
AI:偏政策推进,强调合规落地与规则明晰,对监管主线更敏感。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/02/24观点输出@YaelSherer בינתיים כל העכבישים עזבו לי את הבית
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/02/24观点输出@YaelSherer זה נכון גם לביצי תרנגולות שקרפדה דגרה עליהם?
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/02/21政策影响IMO this is an insecure design choice by the @safe team, `operation` should have never been a parameter to execTransaction method but should have been moved to its own execDangerousTransaction method to avoid UI/phishing attacks.
AI:偏政策推进,强调合规落地与规则明晰,对监管主线更敏感。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/02/21观点输出There's only one thing worse than "no simulation" and that's "wrong simulation", I wonder how many wallets that simulate Safe's contract calls, flag contract calls with "operation = 1" as a parameter (instead 0). This was literally a one bit attack. 🤯
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/02/21观点输出Holy sh!t @safe multisig simulations are hard, especially when done in STDv4 setting, in those cases simulators should use the embedded `to`, `value` and `data` parameters - a zero value transfer(address,uint256) in this case - no simulation effects even, HOWEVER... https://t.co/FqRbCkWkCE
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/01/28观点输出RT @_eiderman: @LindellYehuda I agree, it's a purist approach The alternative from UX perspective is to tell users: "just keep those keys…
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Shmuel Eiderman@_eiderman · 2025/01/27观点输出@LindellYehuda I agree, it's a purist approach The alternative from UX perspective is to tell users: "just keep those keys somewhere less safe forever", which is always worse. Better to allow import and set "imported: true; attestation: null"
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。


评论
暂无评论