
Michael Bentley
@euler_mabMichael Bentley 是 Euler Finance 创始人、前 CEO,兼具学术背景与 DeFi 创业经验;其在 Euler 之后仍持续关注加密基础设施与应用层项目,具备一定行业辨识度与早期项目影响力。
人物档案
Michael Bentley 是 Euler Finance 创始人、前 CEO,兼具学术背景与 DeFi 创业经验;其在 Euler 之后仍持续关注加密基础设施与应用层项目,具备一定行业辨识度与早期项目影响力。
偏好早期、技术驱动的项目,决策更看重协议设计与产品可行性;风险承受度中等偏高,但整体逻辑仍以基础设施与长期网络效应为主。
近期公开信息显示,他仍以投资者身份关注多个项目,覆盖期权 AMM、比特币 DeFi 与游戏等方向;整体叙事更偏向探索新型金融原语与应用场景。
AI 风格画像务实派、技术型、高风险
主导特征务实派
学术训练扎实,偏向用结构化思维判断协议机制与技术边界,关注能否真正落地而非单纯叙事。
比较优势技术型
相比纯财务背景投资人,他更能从产品架构、风险模型和协议设计角度识别早期项目的核心价值。
主要争议高风险
其关注领域多处于早期阶段,创新性强但不确定性也高,容易面临市场周期与执行风险的双重考验。
职业履历
Euler Finance 创始人
Michael Bentley 是 Euler XYZ 创始人、前首席执行官。
关联实体

Lombard
DeFi比特币 DeFi 协议

Footium
游戏多人足球管理游戏

Derive
DeFi期权自动做市商 (AMM)
投资偏好
合规基础设施重仓
公开投资中包含偏基础设施与金融原语的项目,显示其更重视协议层能力、可组合性与长期使用价值。
DeFi 协议重点
对 DeFi 方向持续关注,尤其是与衍生品、比特币金融化相关的协议,符合其对机制设计的偏好。
衍生品与定价机制关注
投资期权自动做市商等项目,说明其对复杂金融工具、定价效率和流动性设计有较强兴趣。
消费级应用选择性
也会配置游戏类项目,表明并非只看纯基础设施;但此类投资更可能是少量、择优参与。
投资活动
Derive · --
DeFi · 衍生品
关系网络
Michael Bentley 的关系网络主要围绕 Euler Finance 创业圈、与多家加密基金的联投关系,以及其在 Derive、Footium、Lombard 等早期项目上的投资足迹展开;公开资料未显示明显的固定同事或任职机构网络。
链上持仓
| 持仓币种 | 价格 | 数量 | 总价值 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC BitcoinBTC | $109,240 | 420.00 | $45.8M |
ETH EthereumETH | $3,420 | 14,200 | $48.6M |
SOL SolanaSOL | $162.4 | 82,000 | $13.3M |
新闻动态
实时同步
加载中...社媒动态
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 1 天前观点输出RT @homeDAO: Whom shall I send? And who will go for us? homeDAO cohort 3 - applications now open https://t.co/a8cW0e2rh7
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 14 天前观点输出@AnaArsonist 🔥
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前赛道影响@jaibhavnani @cocoahomology Simpler times. Good morning. https://t.co/XNtmuWcXPj
AI:偏主题投资表达,释放对基础设施与新叙事的偏多信号。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前观点输出@mnowakdesign I spend far too long worrying about things like this rather than finishing things, but hurts my eyes when things aren’t perfectly aligned
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前观点输出@DonAlt get me in lil shid
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前政策影响I doubt it, just a harsh less in business tbh. I read Peter Thiel’s book before I started Euler and again after I left, and it’s all in there tbh. Very hard to navigate the regulatory terror years though tbh. I do think Morpho have done exceptionally well, but had a little bit of second mover advantage and not the baggage some of us older Defi protocols were carrying.
AI:偏政策推进,强调合规落地与规则明晰,对监管主线更敏感。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前观点输出Oh I know. Honestly I can’t tell you how much the exploit set us back though. The things we had in motion just before that. The deals and partnerships we lost and never won back. I think DeFi lending would look very different today were it not for that. But it was it is. Life goes on. I gave it my all and it wasn’t enough.
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前观点输出@cocoahomology @0x_mcfly About the dynamics or the follow?
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 22 天前观点输出Very steep. It was especially challenging I found because the rules of the game kept changing under your feet. We started in a world with DAOs and 50% token supply giveaways to the community and ended during a period where none of that mattered any more and was more harm than good.
AI:延续个人公开立场,强调长期主义、执行效率与行业方向判断。
Michael Bentley@euler_mab · 23 天前政策影响I sincerely doubt the number is that high. Insane if so. But the point about using a low float high FDV token to strike deals for exclusive integrations still stands. People used to say to me all the time at Euler: “do more BD.” But lack of integrations almost always was nothing to do with BD efforts. Very few people we didn’t speak to during my time there. It almost always came down to money. “So and so are offering X millions for an exclusive integration, what can you do?” I assume most of those types of deals were done with tokens and not real $ because the numbers were often eye watering. And we had 1/100th of budget or less than competitors because of the depressed EUL token price. So we would always get excluded or pushed aside once someone else came in. Sometimes people talked to us enthusiastically one day and completely ghost us the next once they’d agreed a deal elsewhere. With the benefit of hindsight I think we should have tried to take Euler private and start again with the token. But hindsight is a wonderful thing. It wasn’t the same regulatory environment as we have now and there were lots of arguments against doing that. The point is that you really need a highly valued token to compete for liquidity and integrations in lending though. The tech is very much secondary to your ability to pay in the early years to bootstrap liquidity and integrations. It does make me wonder what will happen when all these pay to play token holders start to take profit after vesting ends or hedge out their exposure though.
AI:偏政策推进,强调合规落地与规则明晰,对监管主线更敏感。
评论
暂无评论