Maple Finance SYRUP
Maple Finance is currently firmly ranked at D- rating thanks to its leading team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
D-21.04 / 100
Sector Rank #848 · Global Rank #1605
Overall Rating
D- · 21.04 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
15.57
Team Governance
41.6
Market Ecosystem
53.32
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
21.04
Maple Finance has an overall rating D-f E (total 17.45), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Maple Finance has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestone data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery data is lacking and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of historical roadmap delivery records makes it impossible to assess delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
68.25/100Consensus Mechanism?As a DeFi protocol, it relies on mature PoS chains like Ethereum.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project's mainnet has been operating stably for about five years, accumulating experience.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information about recent upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As a DeFi application, it does not involve client diversity.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Tokenomics
26.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on token burns or deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of public token inflation rate data, creating uncertainty.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of specific data on token staking or lock-up rates.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have clear supply caps, which contribute to their long-term value.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Team Governance
54/100Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with good backgrounds.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of transparent details about governance mechanisms and insufficient transparency.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Financial Transparency?Financing information is open and transparent, but details of fund usage remain to be seen.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts use agency models, with low multi-signing ratios and risks of centralization.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
55/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate, and user engagement has room to improve.Weight 30%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains, with good ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The total value locked in the protocol is relatively high, indicating strong market trust.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of publicly available developer community active data, and GitHub repository activity is not obvious.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Security & Compliance
7.5/100Historical Major Failure?Contracts carry risks of proxy mode and permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are safety red lines, and regulators may take a cautious approach.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are safety red lines, and the SEC may take a cautious stance.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?As a DeFi application, it does not involve the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Maple FinanceD- · 21.04 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 21.04 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 15.57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 41.6 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 53.32 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.