Unibase UB

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public delivery data leads to low development activity.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 25 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery information and low development activity.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 25 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public information on historical deferral records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a token, it relies on the underlying chain consensus and has no independent mechanism.Weight 30%Dependence on Underlying Chains (BSC/ETH) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime, and its stability remains to be verified.Weight 15%About 0.7 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, it depends on the diversity of underlying chain clients.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 70 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear deflationary mechanism, weak token demand logic.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?A large number of tokens remain to be released, facing high inflationary pressures.Weight 25%High (75% pending) · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market liquidity is high.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a fixed supply cap, but the total volume is relatively large.Weight 20%10 billion · 40 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in scale, and VC endorsements are limited.Weight 30%The core team is relatively small in size · 40.7 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is relatively centralized, with moderate authenticity.Weight 25%Centralized governance · 68 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding proposal voting and treasury transparency are moderate.Weight 25%Medium transparent · 68 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated, posing a single point of risk.Weight 20%There is a concentration risk · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate.Weight 30%Average performance · 68.1 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Lack of an ecosystem or L2, with zero third-party integrations.Weight 25%0 · 0 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-type and has no direct TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are currently no publicly disclosed records of major safety failures.Weight 25%No known records exist · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear stance from the SEC regarding the nature of its tokens.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Security Score Code Security Score is moderate, with a low frequency of bugs.Weight 15%to be on the low side · 70 / 100