Internet ComputerICP#60C+ rating

ICP Mainnet

Open-source blockchain network

$2.1

↓ -$0.02004 · -0.95% (24H)

Mkt Cap$1.16B0.05% share

FDV$1.16B555.3M

24H Volume$23.96M

Circulating Supply555.3M100% circulating

ATH$700.65-99.70% from ATH

Price chart

Live

O $2.1H $2.1L $2.07C $2.081.57%

Volume · ICP 0

24H high$2.1

24H low$2.07

Open price$2.1

Amplitude1.57%

Market data

Market cap$1.16B

Fully diluted valuation$1.16B

24H volume$23.96M

7D volume$271.47M

Circulating supply555.3M

Max supply∞

Mined ratio--

Next halving--

Market cap rank#60

Market share0.05%

All-time high$700.65

All-time low$2.01

Price change (multiple periods)

1H+0.63%

24H-0.95%

7D+1.43%

14D-4.56%

30D-2.78%

90D-12.25%

YTD-24.20%

1Y-58.71%

Exchange distribution


1	Hotcoinhotcoin_global	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.16	$3.36M	11.64%
2	Binancebinance	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.1	$2.41M	8.35%
3	LBanklbank	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.11	$1.95M	6.75%
4	XT.COMxt	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$3.29	$1.92M	6.66%
5	OKXokex	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.1	$1.57M	5.43%
6	BloFinblofin_spot	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$1.5M	5.20%
7	Poloniexpoloniex	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$1.34M	4.64%
8	Coinbase Exchangegdax	ICP/USDICP / USD	$2.18	$1.32M	4.57%
9	BTCCbtcc	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$1.09M	3.76%
10	GroveXgrovex	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$1.03M	3.57%
11	About WhiteBITwhitebit	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$1.01M	3.50%
12	Phemexphemex	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.1	$889.55K	3.08%
13	Krakenkraken	ICP/USDICP / USD	$2.12	$889.31K	3.08%
14	Toobittoobit	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.07	$528.83K	1.83%
15	CoinWcoinw	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.15	$494.44K	1.71%
16	Biconomy.combiconomy	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.1	$476.62K	1.65%
17	CoinUp.iocoinup	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.14	$458.63K	1.59%
18	Binancebinance	ICP/USDCICP / USDC	$2.1	$438.52K	1.52%
19	Hibthibt	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.09	$416.59K	1.44%
20	Bybitbybit_spot	ICP/USDTICP / USDT	$2.15	$381.1K	1.32%

AI investment view

Based on historical content analysis

Bull case3

Endorsed by top institutions—The project has received early support from well-known venture capital institutions, with strong financial strength and strong industry resources.

High technical implementation and delivery rates—The technical implementation score reached 92.80, and the roadmap delivery rate reached 94.79. The core development team has extremely high technical barriers in distributed computing.

Unique decentralized cloud positioning—Utilizing innovative technology, it aims to provide a standalone hardware network without traditional cloud services, offering unlimited scalability and extremely low computational costs.

Bear case3

The tokenomics model has flaws—Its tokenomics score is only 7.62, and the smart contract has additional issuance rights, facing potential inflationary pressures and regulatory compliance risks.

Ecosystem construction and lock volume are sluggish—On-chain ecosystem applications have low activity and severely insufficient value control, resulting in tokens lacking substantial network usage support.

Price momentum is extremely weak, approaching the low—Over the past 30 days, the price has dropped 33.11%, with the current price at $2.26 approaching the historical low of $2.02, showing a clear leading effect amid market risk aversion.

WOOFUN Rating

C+

Overall score 56.9 / 100

Internet Computer is rated C+ (total 56.94) with pressured fundamentals. The main drag is Security & Compliance (0) — this dimension scores below the other five. Team view: "Stay cautious until key weaknesses improve." Suggestion: participate cautiously until key risk metrics heal.

View Full Rating Report

Roadmap82 / 100B-

Team81.6 / 100B-

Technical82.1 / 100B-

Market77.9 / 100C+

Tokenomics60.1 / 100D-

Security0 / 100F

Peer comparison

SMART-CONTRACT-PLATFORM peer assets

Metric	Internet ComputerThis coin	BitcoinBTC	EthereumETH	BNBBNB
Current Price	$2.1	$64,753.72	$1,908.16	$594.69
Mkt Cap	$1.16B	$1.3T	$230.3B	$79.19B
Mkt Cap Rank	#60	#1	#2	#4
24H Change	-0.95%	+1.02%	+2.10%	-0.77%
7D Change	+1.43%	+1.44%	+0.46%	+0.23%
Consensus	--	PoW	PoS	PoSA
Max Supply	No cap	21M	No cap	200M
WOOFUN Rating	C+ (56.94)	A (91.61)	A (91.29)	B+ (79.58)
ETF Status	--	Listed	Listed	--

News Updates

Live sync

Comments

Replying to @User

0/800

No comments yet.

Basic information

Token symbolICP

MainnetICP Mainnet

Consensus--

Launch2021-05-11

Block time--

FounderDominic Williams ∞

Next halving--

Ask AI about ICPCOIN AI

Community interest

--Tweets (24H)

--Heat Change

--Bullish Sentiment

0KOL Mentions

Recent KOL mentions

dom | icp@dominic_w3D

bearishTell me I'm wrong — quantum has now become Crypto's Y2K narrative (which enabled scaremongering consultants to make bank in the late 90s). Hardly a day goes by without some not-very-technical network claiming kudos because it's quantum safe. As Chief Scientist of DFINITY and someone who has hopefully created some interesting applied cryptography and network designs in the form of the Internet Computer, here's my honest take. I've spoken to a lot of senior people who don't have an iron in the quantum computing game, and the consensus seems to be that cryptographically-relevant quantum computing (which can break established cryptography) could still be decades away, however... Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it is in fact coming in 5 years, which we can theorize AI might help happen — and we should hope it comes quickly, because this kind of quantum computing would be a great thing for humanity, just like AI, and hopefully fusion power. Even if we assume this, should quantum be what Crypto is focusing on, and should networks be switching over to the latest "quantum-secure" cryptography schemes to impress everyone with how advanced they are, and how unsafe their competitors are? Sadly, I can tell you, they should not be. Let me explain... Firstly, the very real problem that Crypto faces, is that AI is getting extremely good at finding holes in open source software code. Running on open source, which reduces the need to trust the developer, is a cornerstone of the Crypto industry (and anyway, AI can find holes in private code too by reverse-engineering binaries, so doing a HyperLiquid doesn't really solve the situation). Secondly, the vast majority of blockchain projects are really just simple copy/pastes of existing blockchain projects, upon which some unique feature has been grafted or claimed. There isn't really any engineering talent behind them, which creates problems when you have to act quickly in response to real time threats. What, you may say!!? However, insiders like me understand that the industry mostly departed from first-principles crypto engineering long ago, in search of quick riches from token sales. For that you need a narrative, and since token buyers don't understand much about how these networks actually work, and are not interested in actually verifying technical claims themselves, and don't understand product/market fit, what matters to them is the narrative marketing machinery they can bring to bear (instead of engineers and researchers, they invest in social media bot armies, paid press, partnering with big money that can be used to literally manufacture and establish market prices, and partners who can help spin the narrative flywheel). This is the real situation, and it doesn't put the industry in a good place to address the real emerging threat — AI. As we've seen from the constant procession of hacks across the industry, the industry's software was already not in a good place before the advent of super smart AI that turbocharge hackers. And AI is getting smarter all the time. Rather than focusing on quantum, most chains should be focusing on improving the security of their code as quickly as they can, and improving the quality of their engineering. But it gets worse... Adopting "quantum-safe" cryptography schemes to spin the narrative flywheel is making them even MORE unsafe. Let me explain. The cryptography schemes that we use today, which are not quantum-safe, have been around for decades. That means we understand the mathematical assumptions that make them work, and armies of researchers have been kicking their tires for a very long time. The world has a very good understanding of how hard it is to break, e.g., elliptic curve crypto on standard computers, through decades of research. We therefore have high conviction that the parameters used are safe against classical computers. Unfortunately, we have no such track record for most quantum-safe schemes, apart from the least efficient hash-based signature schemes. To see this in action, look at what just happened to HAWK, which was under consideration for being made an official US standard (Mythos found the problem):arstechnica.com/security/202…We could see improved attacks against other schemes too, like the NIST-standardized Dilithium and Falcon. Crypto needs to go slow with this, not fast, because cryptographically-relevant quantum computing is not just around the corner (even if new narratives and marketing can be). We need to go slow and take steps nearer the time, giving all this a chance to shake out. TLDR; we should not be rushing to implement quantum-safe schemes that could be broken by AI tomorrow, when cryptographically-relevant quantum computers that can break traditional cryptography are years away. Note that the situation is slightly different for governments and corporations transmitting super secret encrypted communications, because adversaries are recording them so they can decrypt them years from now when cryptographically-relevant quantum computing is real. They need to use stronger ways to encrypt their communications. However, this is not the situation for Crypto at all. Crypto needs to focus on protecting users from holes in code that AI uncovers. End of. AI is vastly greater threat, and it's happening NOW. Stay safe out there.

dom | icp@dominic_w3D

bullishOne of the most exciting projects I'm working on right now: the Mechanicus agent framework. It's designed to automate migration of enterprises to Open SaaS running on ICP cloud engines. Set it going, get tamperproof AIware SaaS that's vastly better, and be free of SaaS bills...

dom | icp@dominic_w4D

bullishICP cloud engines, and Open SaaS, will be big in both enterprise and sovereign compute fields, and are coming soon. Tip for countries wanting to create sovereign exchanges for any asset class. Use the MULTI/DEX open source to bootstrap them on cloud engines. Secure + low cost.

dom | icp@dominic_w4D

bullishMULTI/DEX demonstrates 100% decentralized, autonomous onchain DeFi on ICP, can serve CeFi-levels of user experience directly into phone browsers without forcing users to install apps#NextGenDeFi

dom | icp@dominic_w5D

bullishMULTI/DEX enters the Phase II, the next trading competition has started, and its gone open source at:github.com/dfinity/public-mu…Now eyeing perps. A 100% onchain advanced exchange like no other in the industry — that no other network could host. Owned by the world. AI native 🔥