PowerPool Concentrated Voting Power CVP

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade information is not transparent, and GitHub activity is missing.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%About 5.75 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recently upgraded public information and quality assessments.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?As an Ethereum ecosystem project, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%Good (benefiting from Ethereum) · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%&None · 30 / 100

Inflation rate?Fixed supply cap, no new token inflation.Weight 25%0% (Fixed Supply) · 95 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?A high TVL-to-market cap ratio indicates good capital lock-in.Weight 25%About 73% (TVL/MC) · 80 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%100,000,000 CVP · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?The core development team lacks public information, and GitHub activity is missing.Weight 30%Insufficient data (limited public information) · 55 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It has a DAO governance mechanism and a good security rating rating.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Good) · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of open sources of funding and access to transparency information.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Lack of public assessment of key figure concentration.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Active Address?Lower rankings in trading volume and market capitalization, and fewer active addresses may be present.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 30 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on two mainstream public blockchains.Weight 25%2 (Ethereum, BNB Chain) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The absolute value of total DeFi locked is relatively low.Weight 25%About $42,000 · 35 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data (low activity) · 40 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety score: Medium safety rating, no major public safety incidents.Weight 25%No major public faults · 75 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment in the DeFi sector is becoming increasingly stringent, with uncertainty emerging.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 60 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC is controversial in determining the security attributes of DeFi tokens.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 55 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100